View Story | 19 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
all of your sets suggest Obama needs to do better in NC than Hillary does in IN. An example:
Marginally Interesting for Clinton: NC: Obama wins by 4-7 points IN: Clinton wins by 9-11 points Marginally Interesting for Obama: NC: Obama wins by 12-16 IN: Clinton wins by 1-4
Marginally Interesting for Clinton: NC: Obama wins by 4-7 points IN: Clinton wins by 9-11 points
Marginally Interesting for Obama: NC: Obama wins by 12-16 IN: Clinton wins by 1-4
I'd go, in this marginal category, with equivalent wins. Obama by 5, Clinton by 10 is equivalent in "gosh-ness" to Obama by 10, Clinton by 5.
There's also no reason for Obama to have to win NC by 21 and IN by 4. Really, a 7 pt NC win plus any IN win for Obama and it's pretty much done.
by Shahryar on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:02:28 PM PDT
Any win in IN would be big, but it wouldn't be fatal. Not for Hillary Clinton at least.
by Elrod on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:08:03 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
It depends on what your definition of fatal is. If he won Indiana by a few thousand votes, less than 25k, I don't think she would drop out, but I do think we'd see an avalance of SD's to him and this race would start looking a lot like Huckabee-McCain post Feb. 5th.
by safik on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:18:53 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 19 comments