View Story | 73 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
was that he was writing about information he heard 2nd hand that was incorrect:
After checking my sources, information that was put out in my email was wrong.
Mad Wombat
by FleetAdmiralJ on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 11:57:56 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
I see.
Well, if there's anything this election has shown again and again it's how quickly a lie can travel.
I'm beginning to think they're going to have to re-work Relativity Theory. Lies are faster than light.
Founder of the Committee to Save asdf
by droogie6655321 on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 11:59:21 AM PDT
original comments. I think rather that he's trying to cover his butt and disavow what he wrote, so as to mitigate any possible repercussions from having violated military rules. I don't see where he explicitly says that he does not believe that Obama blew them off and that he takes it all back. That, to me, would be recanting.
by concernedamerican on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 12:07:27 PM PDT
Army officials refute claim of Barack Obama snub in Afghanistan
"These comments are inappropriate and factually incorrect," said Bagram spokeswoman Army Lt. Col. Rumi Nielson-Green, who added that such political commentary is barred for uniformed personnel. Obama didn't play basketball at Bagram or visit the Clamshell, she said. Home-state troops were invited to meet him, but his arrival was kept secret for security reasons.
Sounds like something he heard second-hand and passed on as first-hand info.
by Don MacDonald on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 12:19:28 PM PDT
planning to vote for McCain and was glad to hear rumors supporting his point of view -- and then pass them on to family members. It sounds to me like he honestly believed what he was told. This is something we should all be aware of -- there are people willing to make up stuff and swear it's true as they send it to everyone they know. I don't understand people like that, but I've certainly encountered a number of them, and unfortunately, they're not all right-wingers; some are on our side (or view themselves as being on our side). After 15 years as a researcher for a progressive advocacy organization, I've learned to be skeptical of just about everything. We receive reports from allied organizations that aren't worth the paper they're printed on, even though they are promoting the same point of view we have. I have no respect for that. If you can't make your point with facts and careful analysis, you should keep your mouth shut.
If, in our efforts to win, we become as dishonest as our opponents on the right, we don't deserve to triumph.
by Tamar on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 12:16:24 PM PDT
My bet is that he's a Republican planning to vote for McCain and was glad to hear rumors supporting his point of view -- and then pass them on to family members. It sounds to me like he honestly believed what he was told.
Taking his retraction at face value, this sounds like the most plausible scenario of what happened to me as well.
by FleetAdmiralJ on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 12:19:52 PM PDT
I appreciate diaries that get to the point right away and source their materials carefully.
by Tamar on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 12:24:29 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 73 comments