Skip to main content

View Diary: Not On Our Watch (236 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Demand hearings to interview WMD whistle blowers (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cedwyn, gmb, cheeselord, Overseas, Quicklund

    We have had so many whistle blowers come out, one by one. The latest, the Europe CIA cheif who says Bush knew all along we'd invade, and embraced the bad evidence and discarded the good evidence to warp his presentation to Congress and the public. He is just the latest of the long list of whistle blowers.

    Get on your soap box and demand hearings!! You don't need to yell for Impeachment. What you need to yell for is proper investigation. You've got enough first-hand whistle blowers to make a mini parade. You've got at least a dozen critical documents.

    If you want to apease the 'angry' activists who want Bush Impeached, you need to demand the proper investigations, and not take 'No' for an answer. The public already knows enough to know Bush is guilty. This injustice has to be stopped. You can demand the proper oversight, without invoking the word 'Impeach'.

    I wish you elite Dems knew how close you were to making this whole charade of an Administration so close to complete collapse. All you have to do is simply publicly ask questions that they don't have the answers to. Questions like:

    "Why we're we accelerating bombing of Iraq in late 2002, before the Administration went to Congress for the AUMF? Do you agree that we were accelerating bombing? Are the UK documents supplied to the House of Commons by the RAF accurate?"

    "Is there anything, specifically, that you believe is incorrect about the Downing Street Memos (around July 23,2003 meeting)"

    "A document says that when you [Bush] met with Blair on 1/31/2003, you proposed falsly painting a US plane in UN colors, and baiting Saddam to shoot at it. What was the purpose of that proposal? Is that document accurate?"

    All you have to do is ask the right questions, publicly and persistently, that Bush does not have the answer to.

    Why did they stonewall any requests of info related to the Downing Street Memos? How do they explain the Downing Street Memo? Legitamate, but the content doesn't matter? Or illigitamate, because the content would have been damning, if true?

    Demand answers. The public will take care of the rest.

    Bush lied to start a war. Now he wants absolute power as the "War President." We're in deep shit.

    by bejammin075 on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:59 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site