Skip to main content

View Diary: "They Just Started Shooting Us Down" -- Kent State (305 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Generations (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SarahLee

    Actually, connecting your comment to the discussions of generations I've seen on here lately, it makes sense that these parents didn't say anything.  They were either from the end of the Greatest Generation or from the beginning of the "Silent" Generation.  These generations tended to let their kids go.  As a result Boomers and Xers were pretty much left to do what they wished.

    Keeping in mind that today's Millennial generation is the most protected generation in recent memory, I think the answer to your last question clear.  First, we need to look at generational development.  A large part of a generation's identity is the reaction of those that have come before it -- largely their parents.  They pay attention to the actions of the previous generation, and they go the opposite way, desiring to find a new identity.  Simultaneously, parents raise their children the opposite of the way they were raised.  For instance, it's not a surprise that today's Boomers and Xers coddle their children, the Millennials, as much as they do.  Getting to your question, I'm not sure we'd get to this large standoff with the Millennial Generation.  First, this generation is predisposed to being more conventional, more pro-establishment than the Boomers were.  Millennials would rather work to change something via a process than through initiating civil unrest.  Second, parents, though they may have been a part of a similar movement at one time, would place their kids' safety and well-being ahead of the political cause in question.  I think that many parents today simply would not allow this to happen.

    "Democrats win when people think." -- Bill Clinton

    by bergerc84 on Wed May 03, 2006 at 07:08:56 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site