Skip to main content

View Diary: A Web Developer's View of Lieberman's Lie (203 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  asdf (5+ / 0-)
    A SQL injection attack can only happen if the site is taking user input.

    Why couldn't they just disable the newsletter sign-up, "contact us" form, and any other input they might have been taking?  From the (admittedly little) that I can tell from the Google-cached page, they could have safely restored most of their content -- if they had decent backups.

    •  Well, there could still be... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      knowthings, lightfoot

      ...malformed GET requests and the like, but the point is that this was most likely 1) a crappy little webhost (probably a decent enough company, as web hosts go, but in way over their heads) that couldn't handle the traffic or, worst-case, 2) a genuine attack that should have lasted for minutes, at most.

      Why am I here? To help fix this country.

      by socratic on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 08:57:11 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  assuming Lieberman had no back-up (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        DemCurious

        (which is pretty amazing in and of itself), my cheap little $20 host makes back-ups every 24 hours and can do a system restore in minutes.  I make backup copies, too, but as others have said, a simple DNS switch through another host could have had the site up with a redirect to the original in about 12 hours max.  desperate and weak and so freakin' obvious it's surreal.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site