Skip to main content

View Diary: FL-24: Curtis ad uses Feeney's dirty tricks against him (17 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I Love It! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    It warms my heart when the Repugs step in their own shit! Now they're positively rolling in their own filth!

    Thanks, pattyp, for the laugh and warm fuzzy feeling!

    Help Laesch Put Hastert  Out to Pasture!

    •  No kidding! (0+ / 0-)

      Feeney would have done better to avoid anti-Clint ads altogether. Everything he's done has backfired and given Clint more credibility and exposure.

      Make your vote really count! VoteNow2006

      by pattyp on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 08:31:31 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  lord knows clint (0+ / 0-)

        has no credibility of his own.

        Why exactly did Conyers omit his testimony from the final report?

        •  I didn't know it had been omitted. (0+ / 0-)

          Bradblog's probably the best place to find the answer though. I've read a lot of Brad's links but haven't seen it mentioned.

          Make your vote really count! VoteNow2006

          by pattyp on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 08:55:13 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  Perhaps because (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          The report was called "What Went Wrong in Ohio"?


        •  Hi Wally O'Diebold! (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          Just reading about you earlier!  What a croc!

          After the Rapture, we'll get all their stuff! Hummingbird's Blog

          by Hummingbird on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 11:43:10 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  croc indeed (0+ / 0-)

            Where am I mentioned in that pdf, or are you practicing the time honoured Bev technique of accusing any detractors of being all detractors? (btw it isn't very polite linking to a pdf without warning)

            Whatever happen to Bev's lawsuit to shut this robp guy down?

            What ever happened to the latest lawsuit Bev said she filed against diebold?

            All bullshit it looks like considering the site is still up.

            •  Well I've seen you post before (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:

              And you use the same kind of tactics, all the time on dailykos.  You attacked Clint's credibility with no reason to do so.  You immediately attack anyone who questions the voting machines.  And since you are "anonymous" how do I know you aren't using a pseudonym? (which you obviously ARE)  You obviously know who I meant by "Wally O'Diebold".  I think you are him.  Which would be that same robp.  I find it interesting that you post to almost every blog on kos that ends up with a link about someone fighting for election integrity.  You must have some sort of notification for anything with the words "diebold" or "Clint Curtis" or "voting machines".

              Sorry about the link to the pdf, I'll remember to warn next time.  I know it hangs people up at times.

              I don't know where her lawsuit is at this point. They take time, and I don't correspond with her.  I'll tell you what, I'll ask her.

              After the Rapture, we'll get all their stuff! Hummingbird's Blog

              by Hummingbird on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 12:21:43 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  no reason to atack clints lack of credibility? (0+ / 0-)

                surely you jest?

                please link to a single attack I've leveled at anyone simply questioning the voting machines.

                As Bev is prone to do, you seem to like to lie, or exagerate in order to deflect. Please see the two tags you mentioned...



                As you and everyone else can see not only do I not post in every diary, I have only posted in one Diebold diary in months, likewise for Con man Curtis.

                The reason you don't know about the lawsuits is because they don't exist.

                Bev said she was suing diebold and robp over the blackboxwatchdog site. She said she had filed the suit. She said she was filing against 16 other people she had identified as being part of an organized effort to smear her.

                All bullshit.

                Ask Bev if she plans to shill for the freeps nov 8th when they claim hugo stole the election for the Dems, and ask clint why Feney's goons killed his dog to shut him up when he now claims...

                "One theory Curtis offered for it was that Feeney had sent out the flyer because the Republican preferred to run against Curtis' opponent."

                Oh and ask Brad why he scrubbed the flashing sirens anouncing the murder of Clints poor dog.

            •  If you hover your mouse over a link (0+ / 0-)

              you will see what kind of file it is before you open it. It's a good habit to develop.

              At any rate, Clint is a Democrat and Feeney a Republican. Good enough reason to support him right there. He has strong progressive stands on many issues, if election integrity isn't good enough for you.

              Make your vote really count! VoteNow2006

              by pattyp on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 05:33:50 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (137)
  • Community (59)
  • Elections (39)
  • Civil Rights (36)
  • Culture (32)
  • 2016 (32)
  • Law (27)
  • Economy (26)
  • Texas (26)
  • Baltimore (26)
  • Environment (26)
  • Bernie Sanders (23)
  • Labor (23)
  • Hillary Clinton (22)
  • Republicans (18)
  • Health Care (18)
  • Barack Obama (17)
  • International (17)
  • Rescued (17)
  • Freddie Gray (16)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site