Skip to main content

View Diary: Expert alleges Anthrax attacks covered up by FBI (279 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Aha, and would this put impeachment (9+ / 0-)

    in a more favorable light, Mrs. Pelosi?

    Perhaps the "i" word is back on the tabletop, eh?  

    When all is said and done, I think they will have trouble keeping their hands off this President, if only to tickle him in the stocks for a few days.  

    Subpoenas, anyone?  Ah, a new drink:  The Subpoena--mix two parts truthy truth with one part invention, roil with glee, spoon off the foam and breathe deeply.

    (-7.63,-6.21) Between Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama - Huh, and I'm a moderate Democrat with a VOTEBLUE tattoo.

    by ezdidit on Wed Dec 13, 2006 at 01:36:41 AM PST

    •  I rarely defend pelosi but in this case I will: (6+ / 0-)

      You have to investigate first, get the evidence, i.e. blue dress in Clinton's case, or, in this case, the indictment of a singing scientist, before you impeach.  You investigate then talk about impeachment when evidence surfaces.

      If, IF this all blows up and goes to the top, a highly unlikely scenario mind you, you can be DAMN sure that there will be impeachment AND trials, convictions, and ultimately executions for high crimes and treason.

      The thing that concerns me the most is Tommy Franks' warning of a WMD-terrorist attack where martial law is declared, maybe right before 2008 election?

      Do you think for an instant that Cheney and Bush wouldn't do it again to stop their convictions?

      That's rhetorical of course so question not directed at you.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site