Skip to main content

View Diary: Senate update (112 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Mark Udall (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Geotpf, Oreo, Dave Montoya

    Just for the record - Mark, not Tom.

    You're right about only wingnuts stepping up on the Republican side.  If someone isn't taping every word Dan Caplis says on the radio every day, they're nuts.  That guy is seriously delusional.  

    •  Who needs editors (4+ / 0-)

      when I've got you guys?

    •  Mark Udall for Colorado (0+ / 0-)

      When I lived in Colorado, I knew the candidate who lost to Dullard TWICE (Tom Strickland) VERY well.  Tom was a good looking, articulate, fairly progressive mountain west democrat that "should" have won in '02.  I realize the politcal landscape has changed in 6 years (alot), but don't expect Udall to win in a cake walk.  Sure dick wad (ham) is running the Colo gop now, but from what I know, I thought Strickland was a better statewide candidate and lost.  Although I concede wingers run Schafer would help Dems imensly.

      It is the province of knowledge to speak and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen. Oliver Wendell Holmes

      by Oliver W Holmes the 3rd on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 12:35:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Tom Strickland lost in part due to (0+ / 0-)

        what I call the facial hair penalty. Challenger candidates with facial hairs typically poll better than they end up getting. Maybe it's a subconscious thing for some voters.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site