Skip to main content

View Diary: Incarceration in the United States. A primer. (81 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Because, I really (0+ / 0-)

    don't care as long as the violent criminal can't harm innocent people anymore.  If you want to room and board them with your family, be my guest.  And yes, a computer could take care of violent offenders.  

    Your crack about rich people when responding to me is just ...weird.

    I don't care about old people who have committed violent offences to the point of being jailed for life.  That's their choice.  Law abiding citizens have more rights than violent criminals.  That's a novel viewpoint I know.

    I'm not in prison because I make conscious choices about my actions.  Don't you?

    •  I'm trying to clarify some things, that's all (0+ / 0-)

      So, if I understand you correctly:

      • you'd be willing to incarcerate a violent offender using your two-strikes formula, basically for life.  Let's say that someone who has been convicted of assault twice by the time they're 25 years old will live to be 75 y.o.  They will be in prison for 50 years (no judge necessary) at a cost of $20,000/year.  You're willing to spend $1,000,000 (this is probably a very conservative figure) to keep them locked up for life, no matter what sort of progress they may have made or whether or not they become infirm?  What happens to their kids?  They all get raised in an orphanage?  Maybe you'll adopt them?  Will the federal government be paying for this or will states be paying?  Are you happy with the relentless, unavoidable expense you'll incur to permanently imprison all these people, even it it means that schools, roads, and other government services get starved for funding because they have to pay to keep an old man (or woman) in jail?

      I'm not talking about you being rich.  I'm talking about wealthy people who can hire a lawyer to get them off or otherwise use their family connections to quash a conviction.  Would you agree that this probably happens on occasion now?  If so, do you think this is just?

      Of course I make my own decisions.  I'm more interested in the real-world impact of this bumper sticker policy.  Obviously money doesn't grow on trees.  How do you plan to pay for this?  How many more prisons would you build?  Do you think this is an effective use of our limited financial resources?

      I don't mean to offend you, but this reminds me of the right wingers who reflexively call for the nuking of, say, Iran.  It's as though they haven't even bothered to think what happens next (our troops and allies in the region get contaminated by radioactive fallout, no one will ever be able to use the land again to, say, retrieve the oil, etc.)  It sounds muscular but that's all.

      I agree, violent crimes are bad.  But a cookie-cutter approach to dealing with violent offenders is just lazy thinking, in my opinion.  I don't want to spend 10's of billions of dollars every single year to keep every single violent offender in prison for life.  If you want to keep this converation going, I'd definitely be interested in hearing how you'd implement this system (details).  Frankly, I think your response is purely emotional and poorly thought out.

      •  Let me clarify (0+ / 0-)

        When I say violent crime I mean really violent, not just punching s/o.  Rape, attempted murder, that level.

        As far as cost.  Not a problem.  Lots of empty space out west.  Work camp set up where they are made to work and produce s/o to offset costs.  Minimal health care, no niceties, basic food and shelter + good marksmen.

        If rich people are getting away with murder then the court system + judges need an overhaul.  That doesn't mean we let the dangerous and violent loose on society when we do nail them.

        If we let out all those low level drug dealers, drug users and the like that would be good.  

        •  Fair enough. Thanks for your time. (0+ / 0-)

          I still think it would need to be hashed out considerably more than we have been doing and I still think it's an attempt to simplify something that is more complicated than people give it credit for, but I have a better idea what you're talking about, anyway.

          •  Yes, it is complex and a venue such as (0+ / 0-)

            this is not adequate to explore what is needed.  At least we on this board see there is a problem and s/g should be done about it.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site