Skip to main content

View Diary: Dems Funding Abstinence-Only Ed? (387 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Read the fricking thread (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    boofdah, Delta Terp

    this wasn't to "appease the 28 percenters"

    It was a trade off for a veto proof majority on a domestic spending bill with $10 billion more than the president requested for social programs.

    Why won't you give the glasses-wearing security kittens a chance to work?

    by bawbie on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 12:33:31 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site