Skip to main content

View Diary: The Nuclear Shill Apologizes. (157 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  not to save coal plants (0+ / 0-)

    but to provide the carbon for liquid fuels.

    Even under the most aggressive replacement of transportation with non-liquid fuels, there are applications where liquid fuels are the only viable solution.  The best example is agriculture.

    I don't buy hydrogen as a feasible fuel.  The only proposed synthetic fuels I am aware of require carbon.  If we wish to provide the carbon without using fossil fuels, that means it needs to come from the air.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (151)
  • Community (59)
  • Baltimore (38)
  • Civil Rights (37)
  • Bernie Sanders (33)
  • Elections (29)
  • Culture (29)
  • Economy (27)
  • Law (25)
  • Texas (23)
  • Rescued (21)
  • 2016 (21)
  • Environment (19)
  • Labor (19)
  • Hillary Clinton (18)
  • Education (18)
  • Freddie Gray (17)
  • Politics (17)
  • Racism (17)
  • Barack Obama (16)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site