Skip to main content

View Diary: Dark Stain on Ronald Reagans Legacy [Kerry Committee's 1986 report] (50 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  She's going to win the nomination unless Gore (0+ / 0-)

    gets in but even he probably can't prevent her from being the nominee at this point

    •  I think Gore can do it. But if he doesn't (0+ / 0-)

      then why bother focusing on ANY corruption? It will ALL get covered up by either the Republican or Clinton.

        •  Well, look at this thread and the concern (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Phthalo, gettowork

          shown for serious corruption that has led to EVERYTHING happening today - especially 9-11 and this Iraq war.

          Politics has become football games but no one cares about honest governance anymore even as they squawk about it - though dishonest, corrupt government has cost this nation and world in so much blood and treasure that we may never recover.

          Those who just want Clintons in because they think they'll be different are abetting the very people who helped protect the Bushes and their agenda in the first place and undermined the 2000, 2002 and 2004 candidates to make sure they would be in place to continue the coverups for BushInc in 2009.

          Notice they never opposed Bush in any public way until the end of 2006?  

    •  I actually think that the Clinton team floats (0+ / 0-)

      Gore's name to slow any momentum of Obama and Edwards.   Note recently Bill Clinton said he thought Gore may run.  Carville said that he thought Gore may run.   I am suspicious of an ulterior motive for any of Carvilles political statements

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site