Skip to main content

View Diary: Insurance? For whom? (117 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Agreed (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Moody Loner

    Viagra should never (hah, absolute, somebody will come up with an extreme case to prove me wrong) be funded out of public pockets.

    Got a problem with my posts? Email me, and let's resolve it.

    by drbloodaxe on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 11:15:13 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Extreme? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      rserven

      My employment-based health care covers Viagra as standard and gender reassignment as optional.

      I don't know what keeping my pecker up, if you'll pardon the crudity, has to do with my workplace performance - but were I transgendered, getting that resolved quickly and easily would certainly improve it.

      Nevertheless... and yes, I'm well aware you said public money.

      Once single-payer goes through, do you want to bet me on whether or not Viagra will be covered before SRS? 'Cause I have money here says it will.

      •  Well (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Moody Loner

        I suppose they could be going by Maslow's hierarchy of needs, but I'd still agree I'd put gender reassignment much higher than Viagra.

        Got a problem with my posts? Email me, and let's resolve it.

        by drbloodaxe on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 11:33:22 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site