Skip to main content

View Diary: Muslims are the New Jews: Bigotry courtesy of the NY Times (183 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  no thanks (6+ / 0-)

    The comment justifying terrorism against Madrid and London was horrific and deserved everything it got.

    •  That comment is hidden (0+ / 0-)

      but Shane Hensinger's offensive and inappropriate comment is not.

      Why is not hidden?  Because user 95669 apparently thinks it's ok to stoop to base and demeaning language to insult fellow kossacks.  And user 95669 is willing to overrule two other trusted users so that the entire world can see Shane Hensinger in all his offensive glory.

      Please tell us what it is about the word "douchebag" that makes it acceptable discourse.  Or remove your inappropriate uprate.

      The notion that not talking to people is somehow punishment to them is ridiculous. Barack Obama, July 23, 2007

      by litho on Sun Oct 14, 2007 at 04:46:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  way to bring out the user ID card (6+ / 0-)

        a big fat "whatever" on that. As far as the rest of your comments, the original comment defending terrorism is hidden because I TR'd it along with Shane. It was still there when you chose to ignore it and TR Shane instead. Calling a terrorism-defender a "douchbag" isn't even in the same stratosphere as actually defending terrorism. I can't understand how you could TR Shane but not the defender of terrorism. Hence, the uprate to Shane and the TR to Mr. Madrin and London Deserved It.

        It is much more embarassing for this web site to have a post that defends terrorism than have a post with the word "douchebag"--I've seen much worse here. Period.

        Personally I wouldn't want to be a "kossack" if the category includes people who defend terrorism, as you seem to be implying, so the demeaning language, not a big deal to me.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site