Skip to main content

View Diary: Could the 2008 Election be Like the 1932 Election? (Part 2) (218 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I didn't think it was snark (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    JG, you seem to think DH was being sarcastic, but I didn't read it that way.

    Rather, I understood "Thanks for Engaging The Argument of This Piece" as being more or less sincere.  You DID write about evidence, and DID make a persuasive point.

    No need to impute snark where I doubt it was intended.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site