Skip to main content

View Diary: Did diebold win New Hampshire for Hillary? (156 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  so why are you posting this? (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    taylormattd, DMiller, andgarden, begone

    You cite your source saying that he has no evidence whatever to back up the claim. Doesn't that mean it is a conspiracy theory, by definition?

    You might recall that conspiracy theories are not allowed.

    •  that blog gets listed a lot in this stuff (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      hoplite9, dotdot, hardtoport, Yombertro

      I've always read it related to stuff that other people posted since 2004. That is why I had my own questions about the subject, but I have seen it linked to before. The person from what I have seen in the past has been correct in a lot of stuff. That is why this is a tough call. I do not think Clinton would have rigged it, but I do not put it pass the establishment that is there. The reasons why I do not know it could have been just to insure our process plays out so other places get to use the machines.

      I just do not want to see the things that happen in the election last time happen again.

      When we are together it isn't me who matters, but the other person

      by AHiddenSaint on Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 11:12:14 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site