Skip to main content

View Diary: Diebold steals election for Hillary (189 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  That doesn't mean much. (8+ / 0-)

    You have to couple that with where machines are used vs. where there are hand counts and then take into account whether there was a more natural base for Obama in those areas. And that's before you can even consider looking into further details to see if there's actual evidence of further bias.

    Just: Obama did great in hand count areas, and Hillary won Diebold areas represents exactly nothing without a lot of further information.

    I hate Diebold and electronic voting as much as the next person, but throwing out random raw numbers with no analysis and no consideration for other factors doesn't make a case for anything except a deep misunderstanding of statisics.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site