Skip to main content

View Diary: First Thoughts on the Town-by-Town Results From New Hampshire (422 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  NH and Election Fraud (0+ / 0-)

    Given the 2000 and 2004 problems, isn't it a bit reckless to claim, without scrutiny, that any election is absolutely clean? A healthy skepticism whenever something surprising happens seems a bit more called for than faith given recent election history. And I wish someone would clear up why certain counties (Dartmouth's) report so late and why they're often the make or break ones. I'm willing to believe (largely conservative, largely independent) NH went for Hillary, but the disparity in expectations, polls, and results certainly requires an explanation (as you are attempting to provide). As for NH's elections being so clean, isn't there a case regarding phone jamming, collusion with the White House, and the Republican state party in play? And are exact recounts by Diebold (now Premier) really reliable when the vendor conducts the recount?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site