Skip to main content

View Diary: A Universal Health Care Plan That Could Actually Pass (11 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Passing Doesn't Mean Solving (0+ / 0-)

    Anytime you have a system in place which has multiple payees and is run from the position of maximizing profit, you'll have a system which is inimically opposed to patient care, since patient care is a cost. This is just a fact.  

    According to Physicians for a National Health Care Program a number of independent studies have clearly shown investor-owned health care health operations provide lower quality care than non-profit organizations.  

    This meme that UHC is politically unfeasible is probably the most effective of all the for-profit health care propaganda.  Closely following are the scare tactics of painful tax increases and the incessant smearing of every other industrialized country's health care system.  

    There are reasons why a single payee approach is necessary.  You can pass a bill, many bills, which don't include it ... but they will NEVER address the major problem: when patient care is a cost to be minimized in order to maximize profit, patient care suffers, sometimes quite horribly.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site