Skip to main content

View Diary: HRC released schedule full of Cheney-like redactions (50 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  So let me get this straight. (0+ / 0-)

    You suggest that I familiarize myself with the rules that regulations of FOIA releases in order to comment on whether or not Clinton was or was not transparent when releasing information that was full of redactions?

    I would like to point out that Clintons are free to release any information they wish about their personal actions unless such release is prohibited by law. If legally prohibited, the Clintons ARE free to point out which information those prohibitions apply to. The long and short is, if she didn't state the redactions were required, it must be assumed that they only exist due to her whim. You know ... the burden of proof is on her, not me, not the government ... on her.

    If she can't be transparent about the information she is releasing in order to gain my vote, I have no reason to expect transparency from her that exceeds the low bar provided by Bush.

    Thank you for your concern.

    ... an older, white, male, Democrat (in so far as the party supports individual freedoms).

    by Juan4All on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 10:26:11 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site