Skip to main content

View Diary: Keep turning up the HEAT on ABC... New Info (656 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Scorched earth? (3+ / 2-)
    Recommended by:
    curiousted, Uberbah, Lava20
    Hidden by:
    mrblifil, SingularExistence

    Sorry, but you have to answer some questions before you begin throwing your ignorant bullshit around. No one likes the smell of unchallenged stupidity.

    Why do you support a liar?
    Why does HRC's husband support trade deals with countries that murder unionists?
    Why was HRC's chief strategists  supporting a trade deal with a country that murders unionists?
    Why did HRC lie about her support for NAFTA?
    Why did HRC lie about being under sniper fire?
    Why was HRC on the board of Wal-Mart for 6 years--one of the most anti-Union companies on earth?
    Why do you support someone whose husband makes trade deals with countries that murder unionists?
    Why do you support someone whose chief strategists works to make trade deals with countries that murder unionists?
    Why do you support someone who votes for gratuitious wars that murder and displace millions without apologies?

    Why do you support someone who votes for amendments that can lead to yet another war of the exact same kind?

    Answer these questions, mrblifil, and I might have just an ounce of respect for you and your fucking worthless opinion.

    Otherwise, fuck off.  You and your fucktard candidate are wasting my time and the planet's air.

    You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

    by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 05:51:59 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Do you want answers (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      brn2bwild, SingularExistence, zephron

      Or do you want to celebrate your fantasies about imposing eugenics on those you view as your political opposition.

      Your wildly inappropriate and intemperate responses suggest to me an underlying problem with women in positions of authority. Believe it or not, I have encountered many who are equally committed to the cause of electing Obama as you are. None of them would even think of approaching others in the manner you have chosen, that of raving drooling dickhead.

      I actually was about to start a point by point rebuttal (even though your intention behind deluging me with challenges is to make a monkey out of me, forcing a long drawn out response), but I reread your final two lines and realized you are not open to honest debate.

      You and your fucktard candidate are wasting my time and the planet's air.

      Here again, as I pointed out upthread, you are actually advocating that people who don't precisely espouse your views are fit for death. These are your words, and I'm beginning to think they aren't hyperbole. I think you might want to consider some time away from the keyboard.

      •  I don't know (0+ / 0-)

        if you are a man or a woman and I don't care. I do know your pathetic evasion is a pretty solid sign of being an utter fool and an asshole.

        If you are able to answer the questions, do it.

        If not, just fuck off.  

        You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

        by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:29:37 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Class vale-dick-torian (0+ / 0-)

          Pathetic, fool, asshole, fuck off. I assume you are copy/pasting your responses from the text of your college application essays...

          BTW, I wasn't positing that you had a problem with my gender, but why would I assume you are capable of holding two concepts in opposition at the same time?

          You are obviously a very nice person, surrounded by love and affection. It is very disappointing to me that I don't merit your approval. I just don't know how I'm going to handle it.

          •  Um (0+ / 0-)

            if you want to use that intellectual vanity of yours for something besides intellectual masturbation you might try answering the questions.

            You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

            by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:38:24 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

          •  this is about my fourth attempt (0+ / 0-)

            to get you to answer a set of questions you saw fit to hide--against the rules.

            I'm still waiting, coward.

            chirp.... chirp....chirp....

            You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

            by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:40:33 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Answering the question (0+ / 0-)

              will simply result in being told to fuck off. 5 minutes on Google will provide you with perfectly acceptable explanations that allow one not to conclude the most negative possible motives were at play on any of those points. I'm not your gerbil to run around doing research for your amusement, only to be told to fuck off.

              Now if you were to apologize for suggesting I'm fit for nothing but death, I might consider it. But I know you won't. Not with the dosage you're currently on.

              •  mrblifil (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                agnostic

                thank you for successfully proving beyond a shadow of doubt why HRC and her supporters still run today one of the most thoroughly dishonest campaigns around.

                I know there are some who might argue that John McCain is more dishonest, but I want you to know that you and your fellow Hilla-Bots have proven you are up to the task of having a totally empty campaign based almost entirely on ad hominems and indefensible lies, excuse me, 'burnished credentials and images'!

                I'm certain with your illustrious 'dick' background you are familiar with the Sophists. You sir--and I say this with the deepest sincerity -- are one the best.

                Thanks for playing.

                You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

                by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:52:30 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  I'm in no way (0+ / 0-)

                  associated with any campaign. I wonder if you can say the same. Still waiting for your apology regarding your wish to see me euthanized.

                  chirp...chirp...chirp...

                  •  But mrblifil (0+ / 0-)

                    what on earth makes you think I want to see you euthanized? There are the constraints of simple humanity, of course and, as I am opposed to capital punishment for utter banality,  I certainly wouldn't actively encourage such an action by the state or anyone else, other, of course, than yourself.

                    Thanks for playing. Oh, and, perhaps I didn't make myself clear before, but let me put it in my inimitable tourettes style so you will 'get' it.  Having proved yourself incapable of defending either your support for your candidate or your candidate's inconsistencies (incessant mendacity, prevarication, oh, and fucking lying )I really don't give a fly fuck about you or your deluded opinions.

                    As Kurt Vonnegut once put it so poetically, mrblifil, "take a flying fuck at a rolling donut, go take a flying fuck at the moon!"

                    You can lead a conservative to facts--but you can't make him think.

                    by DelicateMonster on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 07:22:56 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

            •  Hiding gross ad hominem flame attacks (0+ / 1-)
              Recommended by:
              Hidden by:
              DelicateMonster

              is certainly not against the rules, but I guess, Dr. Jeckyl, you should be the one to tell that to your alter ego.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site