Skip to main content

View Diary: Pennsylvania Delegate-Count Tracker (173 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Personally (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Allogenes

    I think if we're going to include Florida and/or Michigan in popular vote tallies (states that have no delegates) we should also include the Texas caucus, which did award delegates.

    Might as well give Obama the delegate-less Washington primary as well, in addition to that state's caucus totals.

    It gets silly after awhile.

    •  Agreed. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Skaje

      As a result, I didn't include FL or MI in the number I quoted, either.

    •  Trouble with including TX-cauc. is that (0+ / 0-)

      you are in effect letting people vote twice. Now Texas  can let its people vote twice it it wants, as long as it doesn't try to send more delegates than it's been allocated; but they're still just one person each.
      But I agree we shouldn't include FL or MI either.
      (Did I get the right abbr. for Michigan? I keep confusing it with MS and MN.)

      When civilizations clash, barbarism wins.

      by Allogenes on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 05:34:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site