Skip to main content

View Diary: John McCain on Barack Obama (171 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Look at the illogic of that statement... (0+ / 0-)

    What kind of baffoon is McCain (and/or his handlers).

    The proposition is that Obama is the weaker candidate on national security.  However, the premise:

    Senator Obama obviously has no national security experience

    has no basis or support, and commits a blantant fallacy (is it "obvious").  Also, implied is that McCain's is superior... based on what???

    Moreover, the conclusion does not follow and beg's the question (is his foreign policy judgement unsound??? as to refect an alledged lack of experience???).  Nice circular reasoning...

    Obama sponsored a bipartisan bill to secure loose nukes... He stated that if Pakistan won't act, then we will have to.  After being criticized, the CIA did exactly that (acted unilaterally by hitting targets in Pakistan).  I would say that the entire arguement is debunked...  if only because the false conclusion, but the inherent fallacies do the job as well.

    "There is no trickle down, because greed expands to absorb any excess." - Devilstower

    by Rich Santoro on Wed May 07, 2008 at 08:26:38 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site