Skip to main content

View Diary: Open Thread (130 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Why is the high road.. (4+ / 0-)

    becoming "the path least taken"?

    I belong to no organized political party, I'm a Democrat. -Will Rogers

    by geez53 on Tue May 27, 2008 at 05:13:11 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Because Hillary (and Bill) cannot stand being (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      a loser (especially Bill, I think). For most people some failure is a part of life and some of us go down in flames despite our best efforts. However I think the Clintons believe they can literally will themselves to success, that the only time they lose is when they admit loss. Don't look for that admission before the convention.  

      •  Interesting Vanity Fair Article, BTW (0+ / 0-)

        Bill had his own purposes behind his slightly uneasy jocularity. "For Bill Clinton, there was no way for his popularity to be tested," said one of Hillary's advisers. "She would carry the burden of his behavior. Politicians are always looking for signs that they have been forgiven—or at least that the public has gone past it. She was a surrogate for him on that." Madeleine Albright told a friend she was "impressed that Clinton was eager for Hillary to win the Senate race to recompense her for all she had to put up with and also a way for him to get back into campaigning." Bill's friend Tom Siebert, who was to raise money for Hillary, recognized that "the Senate race kept them in public life.... They grabbed the brass ring early in their lives, and running for elective office was in her DNA as much as his."

        The prospect of teaming up in another race had a salutary effect on the Clintons' relationship by shifting their conversation to safe ground, away from the personal issues they had been grappling with in couples therapy. "Bill and I were talking again about matters other than the future of our relationship," Hillary later wrote. "We both began to relax. He was anxious to be helpful, and I welcomed his expertise." Susan Thomases observed, "She always had enormous respect and affection for him in the political context. He was always the strategist for himself and for her."

        To announce...that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.

        by potownman on Tue May 27, 2008 at 08:17:18 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site