Skip to main content

View Diary: District Court: What FISA Did, What the FISA Capitulation Does (244 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  This diary doesn't mention Obama (4+ / 0-)

    so quit spamming.

    Now go stick your head back in the sand.

    •  No, just the first Post in this diary does and (0+ / 0-)

      just about every other post in the diary does, but I don't see you going after them either for attacking Obama.  Just me for defending him....  

      Oh the sand reference, I'm lucky I don't have to deploy until maybe the winter....  So while alot of people "talk" or type about the Constitution, it affects me more than others.....

      Yeah, I'm an asshole, but assholes are needed. We get rid of shit that's not needed and we are able to provide pain & pleasure..

      by fromdabak on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 07:38:10 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Good point about the comments (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        bablhous, 3goldens

        ...but if you think you have more rights to opinionate on the constitution due to deploying, that's untrue.

        Utmost respect for your service.

        •  Did I ever say that my opinions have more sway (0+ / 0-)

          due to my deployment or my service?  No, I never did, you told me to put my head into the sand and I told you I will whenever I deploy....  

          I just mentioned that I'm more directly affected by the Constitution than alot of people here that are "outraged" about the new purity test called FISA.....

          Oh are you now going to tell the people that are attacking Obama on this issue to stop spamming as well?  I don't think so, but prove me wrong.  You however went right after those that defended him, so I see your "rule enforcement" is selective....

          Yeah, I'm an asshole, but assholes are needed. We get rid of shit that's not needed and we are able to provide pain & pleasure..

          by fromdabak on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 08:25:22 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I went after you for your strawman argument (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            bablhous, 3goldens, KingCranky

            ...that critiquing Obama means President McCain.

            Mocking people by calling their critiques phony outrage (implied by quoting it in your comment) and purity is counter-productive to your goals.

            I'm more directly affected by the Constitution than alot of people here that are "outraged" about the new purity test called FISA.....

            For a good example of your argument without the condescension and shaming, please read the recent diaries by Elise and Blueness, who made points I don't necessarily agree with but did so calmly and with compelling points.

            I rec'd both those diaries even though I disagreed with some of the content, because they took on the issue squarely and fairly.

            •  No you went after me because according to you the (0+ / 0-)

              diary didn't mention Obama but I was defending him.  

              I also noticed you didn't go after anyone other than those defending Obama.

              And my "strawman" arguments, was to highlight how a McCain administration would treat the Constitution versus an Obama administration.  

              But hey, let me go put my head back in the sand and let you have your fun at "critiquing" our nominee who has to fight a three front campaign from his left (so-called base), from the right (his supposedly real opponents) and from the ignorant racists (that still believes he's Muslim/Foreign/Terrorists/Non-Patriotic)....  

              I'll have fun with my sand castles and stuff....

              Yeah, I'm an asshole, but assholes are needed. We get rid of shit that's not needed and we are able to provide pain & pleasure..

              by fromdabak on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 09:11:26 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site