Skip to main content

View Diary: AR-Pres: Not this year (177 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  And wouldn't arkansa tv markets... (4+ / 0-)
    Be the cheapest way to at least lightly chip off McCain support in SW MO?
    •  And Southeast Missouri Too Most Likely.... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      rogun

      I've never understood the snub here.

      •  if you perceive it as a "snub" (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Anthony Segredo, askew, MadEye, HowieBeale

        that a candidate with finite time and resources is not coming to every corner of the country, you are bound to be disappointed.

        For all the people claiming it has to do with him "punishing" Clinton voting states, have you considered that maybe race is more of an issue in Tennessee and Arkansas than it is in, say, Montana? That maybe it is not just some undying love for Clinton but that these are the toughest states for an African-American to win?

        •  The Campaign Is Advertising In Expensive Georgia. (0+ / 0-)

          His resources are not that "finite".  If it can afford to advertise in expensive and far more Republican in Georgia, it can afford the cheaper and more Democratic Arkansas.

        •  I don't perceive it as a snub from Obama (0+ / 0-)

          Not anymore so then usual, anyway. Mark27 has a good argument, but Obama is winning, and I understand the uphill battle he would face in Arkansas, so I trust that his campaign is making the right decisions.

          Having said that, it's pretty standard for Democratic Presidential candidates to spend less time in the sate then their Republican rivals, even though Arkansas is a Democratic state. I believe Arkansas is written off almost immediately by Democratic nominees, but like Mark27, I don't think it would take that much effort for them to actually win the state. Arkansas was considered a swing state in 2004, but Kerry only visited one time (one more then Obama, mind you), and basically just adorned a razorback hat for pictures, so it wasn't surprising that Bush ended up carrying Arkansas easily, because his campaign treated it like it was a swing state.

          It's lowly 6 electoral votes are certainly much of the reason Arkansas is ignored by Democrats, but I also think that outsiders wrongly consider Arkansas to be extremely conservative, when it's really not as much as they think (it's too poor to be extremely conservative collectively, although it does have a large extremely conservative faction.) When I read Carnacki's diaries on West Virginia, I feel as if he's actually writing about Arkansas, because most of what he says would uniquely apply to Arkansas just as well.

          Democrats -- Progress for the Working Class

          by rogun on Sat Oct 25, 2008 at 08:03:22 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  The TV here is out of MO.............. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      rogun, HowieBeale

      .........We get the local stations out of Springfield MO, so have ads targeting their local elections and the Federal ads too.

      We are only 11 miles south of the Mo line and I have no idea how far futher south of us Sprinfields coverage goes. But if I was in Mo I'd be favoring Nixon and it has been nice to see the Obama ads, which I'm guessing that most Arkansans are not getting. Plus the chance to yell liar at my TV when McCain comes on. lol God he fell in a nasty hole when he became the nominee.

      •  Most folks (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        HowieBeale

        I know have a dish (in south AR).  So we still get the ads running nationally, and some from New York and L.A..  

        Watch this space. Something brilliant will come to me soon, I'm sure.

        by tresgatos on Sat Oct 25, 2008 at 10:03:29 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site