Skip to main content

View Diary: The fake troops in Bush's new ad (334 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Why? (none)

    Why are they covering up Bush?

    It's a Bush ad... Here's Bush talking to the troops... Why cover him up?

    The only thing that I can think of is that he looks small in the frame. Most Bush ads show close ups and images of Bush looking larger than life, the sort of imagery that can inspire a feeling of power (or powerlessness) in the viewer. Is it that they are afraid of Bush looking human-sized?

    Does anyone else know why they might have done this?

    •  Leni Riefenstahl Again (none)
      The shots of Hitler in Triumph of the Will are from below, to make him look bigger.
    •  It's subliminal (none)
      It's meant to reach out to those in middle America who might have reservations about the President. You must still fear for the death of your innocent child at the hands of terrorists. This president will not hesitate (facts be damned) to sacrifice as many of the lives of these clones as necessary in order to protect your children.

      We're not scaremongering, this is really happening. - Radiohead

      by Karma Mechanic on Thu Oct 28, 2004 at 11:00:30 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  This is a great straight line (none)
      for any number of jokes at Bush's expense. I would encourage anyone to invent as many of these as they like. I like the ones about using cloning to avoid a draft.

      However, to my way of thinking, the real explanation is pretty simple... and indeed, fairly innocent. They wanted to use this shot as a background for text. But, oh dear, the arrangement of text they had in mind, and finally used, would have covered up Bush's face. Not good. Not respectful to the candidate.

      What to do? Photoshop Bush out, fill the space in quickly with sections taken from elsewhere in the picture, and voila, a generic military crowd scene with a composition that will let the text stand out, and a cute kid waving a flag to make it visually interesting. Hey, who's gonna notice? Nobody's going to look at it that closely. (Little did they know...!)

      So. This isn't a crime here, it isn't a nefarious conspiracy, it's just a graphics designer trying to solve a technical graphics design problem. And being a bit lazy about it. Or pressed for time.

      But go ahead, you can still have plenty of fun with it. Ridicule is more devastating than indignation.

      If a landslide falls in the bit bucket... was there an election?

      by Canadian Reader on Thu Oct 28, 2004 at 11:31:50 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Lazy... (none)
        ... is right! I am a graphic designer, and I would agree above is the probable scenerio. I have "cloned" many a photo element to make the layout work (where the changes do not have a bearing on the message of the piece), but you always make sure you don't do it like this!!!

        How embarrassing in more ways than one!

        The sleeze just gets deeper and deeper.  

      •  Double Coverup (none)
        I would say, as a cloning practitioner, that the entire foreground has been added, again to cover up a distracting area of seated spectators or something similar. That's why you have that slight line separating the bottom foreground from Bush & company. When I started to search for images on Google, I actually looked for parade images because I thought there was a street between the two groups.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site