Skip to main content

View Diary: Gay Marriage is a Religious and Civil Right (123 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  HRed for right wing talking points & homophobia (0+ / 0-)

    So you admit you think being gay is no different than being a polygamist?  That shit doesn't belong on Kos.

    Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

    by Futuristic Dreamer on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 02:22:16 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  your continued rating abuse (0+ / 0-)

      speaks volumes at to who the bigot is in this discussion.

      •  You're not having this discussion in good faith, (0+ / 0-)

        so the HR is justified.  You're arguing that gay marriage = pologymy and that's actually an argument against gay marriage.

        Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

        by Futuristic Dreamer on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 07:43:32 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  Oh, an by the way . . . (0+ / 0-)

      Since I've already stated support for gay marriage (as a subset of support for all kinds of marriage among consenting adults) how on earth do you read "homophobia" into it?

      Why should three women who love each other not be permitted to marry?

      •  You don't understand that some people are only (0+ / 0-)

        attracted to people of the same sex, which is the definition of being gay.  That's bigoted.

        Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

        by Futuristic Dreamer on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 07:44:48 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  you haven't got a clue (1+ / 1-)
          Recommended by:
          blueness
          Hidden by:
          Futuristic Dreamer

          what I "understand".  

          Why do you hate lesbians?

          Why should three women who love each other not be permitted to marry?

          •  You don't know what a lesbian is (0+ / 0-)

            A lesbian is a woman who is attracted to other women.  Most lesbians have one life partner, just like most straight people.

            You seem to be confused, and believe that a lesbians requires two, not one partner(s).  That's a lie and a bigoted one.

            Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

            by Futuristic Dreamer on Wed Nov 12, 2008 at 08:40:01 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  not even wrong . . . (0+ / 0-)

              A lesbian is a woman who is attracted to other women.  

              Interesting that you use the plural "women" . . .

               Most lesbians have one life partner, just like most straight people.

              There is no evidence that single partner lifetime monagamy is any more common among lesbians than it is among straights (where it is not common at all).  Lesbians "hook up", just like everyone else.  Lesbians sometimes "live together" and "commit", just like everyone else.  And then they commonly "break up" (or divorce, if married), just like everyone else.  They have "affairs", just like everyone else (with or without the consent of their "partners", just like everyone else).  And sometimes they practice polyamory, sometimes including men (there's a "B" in LGBT, in case you hadn't noticed).

              In the extended community (city) in which I live, and which I have observed for well over 40 years, I've seen it all.  The lifetime single partner is the rare exception, regardless gender.

              You seem to be confused, and believe that a lesbians requires two, not one partner(s).  That's a lie . . .  

              I suffer no such "confusion" and have said nothing to suggest that I do.  That lie is yours to own, not mine.

              Noted also is your continued intellectual cowardice, and rating abuse.  But "hide" rating the question won't make it go away . . .

              Why should three women who love each other not be permitted to marry?

              •  The fact that 2 married people may not be (0+ / 0-)

                together forever doesn't mean that 3 people would be.

                Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

                by Futuristic Dreamer on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 05:48:29 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (155)
  • Community (74)
  • 2016 (53)
  • Elections (50)
  • Bernie Sanders (45)
  • Environment (39)
  • Climate Change (37)
  • Culture (36)
  • Hillary Clinton (34)
  • Republicans (33)
  • Civil Rights (31)
  • Science (31)
  • Media (30)
  • Education (30)
  • Barack Obama (28)
  • Law (25)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (22)
  • Congress (22)
  • Labor (22)
  • Economy (21)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site