Skip to main content

View Diary: Moving Forward? Here Are The Rules. (84 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Geez, people, stop with the righteous hyperbole. (3+ / 0-)

    Obama has not "refused" to prosecute where necessary. And both he and Biden are correct in that their job is appropriately to move the country forward. If you'll recall, in his Stephanopoulos interview, Obama said very clearly that, as AG, Holder will be the people's attorney, and he will have to "make some calls". Have you not noticed that Obama is very skilled at allowing people to do their jobs? It is not the President's job to order around the AG. Remember how well dictating orders to the AG worked out in the Bush administration?

    Yes, I have signed the petition, as it is directed to Eric Holder, which is where it should be directed. His nomination, along with Dawn Johnsen, bodes well for justice for Bush admin officials who gave a green light to torture and other war crimes. If nothing comes of it, then I will make a stink, absolutely. But nowhere, absolutely nowhere, have I seen Obama state that he would "refuse" to prosecute. It is not his damn job to prosecute.  

    If confirmed, it will be Holder's job to hold those guilty of crimes accountable. I have not seen evidence that he will not do so. If he is confirmed and then does not investigate, indict and try admin criminals accountable, then I will get pissed off.

    •  Bravo - (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      conchita, Edger

      this is how Obama works - he's the President of the United States (soon!!!), and his job is to unite the warring factions.  Holders job is to prosecute.

    •  ... (0+ / 0-)

      Criticisms, political pressure and Barack Obama

      by Glenn Greenwald, Salon

      Tuesday Jan. 13, 2009 08:47 EST

      Politicians, by definition, respond to political pressure. Those who decide that it's best to keep quiet and simply trust in the goodness and just nature of their leader are certain to have their political goals ignored. It's always better -- far better -- for a politician to know that he's being scrutinized closely and will be praised and supported only when his actions warrant that, and will be criticized and opposed when they don't.

      Right this moment, there are enormous pressures being exerted on Obama not to make significant changes in the areas of civil liberties, intelligence policy and foreign affairs.  That pressure is being exerted by the intelligence community, by the permanent Pentagon structures, by status-quo-loving leaders of both political parties, by authority-worshipping Beltway "journalists" and pundits (such as the ones who wrote the wretched though illustrative "What Would Dick Do?" cover story for this week's Newsweek).

      If those who want fundamental reform in these areas adopt the view that they will not criticize Barack Obama because to do so is to "help Republicans," or because he deserves more time, or because criticisms are unnecessary because we can trust in him to do the right thing, or because criticizing him is to "tear him down" or "create a circular firing squad" or "be a Naderite purist" or any of those other empty platitudes, then they are ceding the field to the very powerful factions who are going to fight vehemently against any changes.  Do you think that those who want the CIA to retain "robust" interrogation powers and who want the federal surveillance state maintained, or want a hard-line towards Iran and a continuation of our Middle East policies, or who want to maintain corporate-lobbyist-domination of Washington, are sitting back saying:  "it's not right to pressure Obama too much right now; give him some time"?

      It's critical that Obama -- and the rest of the political establishment -- hear loud objections, not reverential silence, when he flirts with ideas like the ones he suggested on Sunday.  This dynamic prevails with all political issues.  Where political pressure comes only from one side, that is the side that wins -- period.


      Obama is about to become one of the world's most powerful political leaders, if not the single most powerful.  He begins with sky-high approval ratings, his political party in control of Congress by a large margin, and enjoys reverence so intense from certain quarters that such a loyal following hasn't been seen since the imperial glow around George Bush circa 2002.  He's not going to crumble or melt away like the Wicked Witch if he's pressured or criticized.  The far more substantial danger is that he won't be pressured or criticized enough by those who are eager to see meaningful changes in Washington, and then -- either by desire or necessity -- those are the voices he will ignore most easily.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site