Skip to main content

View Diary: In the Washington Times: a call to investigate, possibly to prosecute (271 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You offer nothing of substance about my primary.. (0+ / 0-)

    ...points, you accuse me of things which are calumny, since I am an insufferable patriot, and you offer nothing except your assertions about Southeast Asia and then use a few hackneyed examples of 'evil Stalinists' to attack me.  Of course, the 'evil Stalinists' involved much more complicated issues than you acknowledge, and they, in any event are completely divorced from Southeast Asia.  

    The Berlin blockade justified slaughtering a million IndoChinese, and somehow, magically, caused us to plan imperial domination of the region two decades before it happened.

    In short you are presumptuous, your arguments consist of non-sequiturs and red-herrings, and, apparently, you have no interest in learning anything about your ignorance.  On the other hand, I revel in learning, so I thank you for your correction below, which supports my POV anyhow, and I can use all of the continued conversation that you present, since it merely sharpens my points to anyone who is objective, as opposed to a nationalistic, anti-communist, imperialist, which pretty much precludes anything akin to objectivity, more's the pity.

    I bow to those who seek the truth; I flee from those who have 'found' it.

    by SERMCAP on Thu Jan 22, 2009 at 06:51:18 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Simply pointing out that there are two (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Mas Gaviota

      sides to the story.  You come across like one of the people that thinks that the Gazans have no reason whatsoever to fight the Israelis which then leads to the obvious conclusion that the Gazans are simply evil.  

      The Stalinists / Soviet Union were for the most part divorced from Southeast Asia.  I would contend that there were Russian advisers there.  The Vietnamese were certainly using Russian arms even if the supply came through China. In hindsight, you can say that Vietnam wasn't a threat to Southeast Asian stability, but at the time, that may not have been obvious.  You also have no idea what the effect on the regimes in Southeast Asia would have been if we hadn't been involved.  You can speculate all you want, but we do know what happened.  If we had done nothing, would Thailand and Malaysia have become communist (against their will I might add)?  You don't know.

      •  Projection is the most primitive form... (0+ / 0-)

        ...of coping strategy.  So that must be why you say this:

          You come across like one of the people that thinks that the Gazans have no reason whatsoever to fight the Israelis which then leads to the obvious conclusion that the Gazans are simply evil.

        You're describing yourself here.  Set this all aside, whenever you're finished trying to squirm your way out of the hole you keep digging deeper.  Then, after a month or two, go back and reread it.  My guess is, with your obvious intelligence, you'll be able to see that you were looking in the mirror when you wrote those lines.  They're sure as shit not about me.

        The presence or absence of the Russians in Southeast Asia has nothing to do with my argument, except inasmuch as it supports the fact of the imperial nature of the venture, by both France and the U.S., long before the Cold War was official, and continuing afterwards, primarily guided and financed, and ultimately fought, by the USA.

        We were the "threat to S.E. Asia's stability."  The murder of millions at our hands and with our weapons at the hands of others, the rise of Pol Pot, a generation of murder and mayhem in the behest of empire, those are not the responsibility of any Stalinist or Russian anywhere.  These evil and self-serving results, about which you continue to advance self-righteous notions of justification, were the responsibility of U.S., and to an extent French and other European, policy makers and leaders.

        I bow to those who seek the truth; I flee from those who have 'found' it.

        by SERMCAP on Fri Jan 23, 2009 at 10:31:22 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I'm not the guy (0+ / 0-)

          that looks at 184,000 dead South Vietnamese soldiers and sees that as proof of US imperialism!

          The murder of millions at our hands and with our weapons at the hands of others, the rise of Pol Pot, a generation of murder and mayhem in the behest of empire, those are not the responsibility of any Stalinist or Russian anywhere.  These evil and self-serving results

          Stop.  You again look with hindsight and decide that this was a foregone conclusion going into things as though it was the plan.  Sure our involvement in Vietnam didn't turn out well but that is the nature of wars.  Some go well some don't.  I guess not everyone is omnipotent and knows the results going in.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site