Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama vs. Usury?  Why Not? (Updated) (251 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  If that was your point, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jessical

    why did you make an unfounded statement about a religion, drawing a false contrast between it and others?

     And if you regard my response as "irrelevant" and "sectarian hair splitting" (rather than the factual correction it actually was), why would you reply to it?

    Silvio Levy

    •  It wasn't "unfounded", it was erroneous (0+ / 0-)

      (at least you claim it is, and I really don't care to argue the point because it makes absolutely 100% no difference to me either way) and it was tangential to the point.

      The reason I respond is because I care about the point, and want to prevent the conversation derailing into silly religious oneupmanship.

      And I most definitely was NOT drawing contrasts of any kind - in fact, my whole point, which you continue to insist on ignoring, is that this is not a religious issue in the first place. This is a discussion about US law. Give it a rest.

      One day posterity will remember, this strange era, these strange times, when ordinary common honesty was called courage. -- Yevgeny Yevtushenko

      by RandomActsOfReason on Sun Mar 29, 2009 at 07:57:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site