Skip to main content

View Diary: FISA Fight: Here We Go Again (122 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  If companies want to work with the government (0+ / 0-)

    they should be able to choose to do so. However, with respect to personal information, the individual should be explicity informed that certain right will be waived should that become necessary.

    Now, the problem we have is the "offer you can't refuse" issue. In other words, if nobody chooses protect your information, you by default lose access to a valuable good.

    This is why I believe we need a privacy law in this country so that it is clearly understood who is able to do what with what. The current system is unworkable for all parties.

    With him from the beginning, with him until the end.

    by brooklynbadboy on Sat Apr 18, 2009 at 09:47:14 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  I'll agree we need stronger protections for our (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Aunt Martha, James Kresnik

      privacy, but companies should not be permitted to "cooperate with the government" when it is illegal to do so. Our government is not permitted to act capriciously, and companies or individuals cooperating with such behavior only encourages further law-breaking by the government.

      It's similar to the situation of a prosecutor asking me to lie on the witness stand. If I do, I am guilty of perjury and should be prosecuted, just as the prosecutor doing the asking.

      The proper thing for either the company or myself to do is report the law breaking and refuse cooperation.

      The rule of law is only enforced if we all take part in enforcing it. A Democracy requires an active and vigilant citizenry. And corporations do not act -- the people in them do.

    •  "Work with the government." (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mcmom, Foxwizard, James Kresnik

      You make it sound oh so innocuous.  Should the government ask a company to kill someone, that company is simply working with the government.  Should the government ask a company to go into a another country and do things that will potentially destabilize it, it is simply working with the government.

      Of course that company should be able to choose to do so.  But that doesn't mean that there should be no potential repurcussions for their choices.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (130)
  • Community (63)
  • Bernie Sanders (44)
  • Elections (36)
  • Hillary Clinton (28)
  • Culture (28)
  • 2016 (27)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Civil Rights (23)
  • Science (23)
  • Environment (23)
  • Spam (21)
  • Law (19)
  • Labor (18)
  • Media (18)
  • Republicans (18)
  • Barack Obama (17)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (15)
  • White House (14)
  • International (13)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site