Skip to main content

View Diary: 9/11 Metastasizing: the Left's Co-Dependency (203 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  NEVER heard of thermite (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    phild1976

    in controlled demolitions.?

    Your consideration of the topic before joining the chorus is instructive.

    Thank god you weigh in so authoritatively about the kind of nonsense some people post here.

    •  I said never heard of it (0+ / 0-)

      not that it's not used

      I never heard of it used

      PLEASE donate to a global children's PEACE project: Chalk 4 Peace

      by RumsfeldResign on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 03:56:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  links debunking thermite use in 9/11 (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Ahianne

        PLEASE donate to a global children's PEACE project: Chalk 4 Peace

        by RumsfeldResign on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 04:08:28 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  debunking the use (0+ / 0-)

          of thermite IN DEMOLITION ??

          Topic shifting much?

          •  wow (0+ / 0-)

            PLEASE donate to a global children's PEACE project: Chalk 4 Peace

            by RumsfeldResign on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 04:12:57 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  People seem to think that if (0+ / 0-)

              they've got a link to something outside DKOS they've carried the debate.

              You expressed a "who knew?" note about the use of thermite in demolition.

              Then you not only find out it IS used in demolition, but also that a constituency exits to prove that is was not used at WTC.

              That constituency exist because of the purported presence of aluminum and sulphur enhanced in the dust,  and the video of molten streams of white "something" dripping from a corner of the tower before the collapse.

              The molten white would be consistent with enhanced thermite, which of course it cannot be for purposes of discussion here.

              So other have already linked to articles about the presence of thermite and you have linked to denials.

              So:

              1. you can conclude that your link trumps the other links because you like them better
              1. you can admit that since your first comment you have learned some things today. But please stop me. I might go on and learn more if this kind of discussion was to be permitted.

              3)you can join me and others in demanding a new investigation to be conducted by people NOT connected to the hierarchy of either political party and no intelligence agency.

              I'd gladly put the whole thing in the hands of a couple of NYC homicide detectives and give them subpeona power.

            •  wow indeed.. (0+ / 0-)

              You were just hoping to get a few kicks in Heckler's corpse before the show ends. Instead, you learned a bit and got lots to think about.

              Janet Napolitano and John McCain have in recent weeks repeated comments about 9/11 hi-jackers entering the USA from Canada.

              The accuracy of information you get from people who should know and defend the "official conspiracy narrative" is sometimes more shockingly ignorant and laughable than many of the critics.

              The "re-open 9/11" crowd is compromised by the lunatic fringe in it.  That lunatic fringe has already "solved" the mystery and they provide ammunition to the jackals.

              The official narrative supporters are also compromised.  They are compromised by the number of supporters who know very little about the debate, but who pitch in to defend the one story from the Bush years you have to accept to post here.

              You played that role today.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site