Skip to main content

View Diary: Pew: Widespread Support For Insuring Everyone, Obama Approval Steady (144 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  My plan is far more realistic than (0+ / 0-)

    Medicare-for-all platitudes.

    You have a frame through which you see the world, and that's fine. You're entitled to that. But you desperately want this issue to fit into that frame, and for once to "beat the evil corrupt corporations which are undermining Medicare for all, and buying off Senators," or whatever is the latest tripe of the moment.

    But what you don't get is that this is an issue that is about people's lives. And if you say, "Unless I get Medicare for All, I'm taking my ball and going home," then people will continue to suffer under this health care system.

    You place so much emphasis on the terms of the debate, and are so defeatist because your parading around screaming about corporate corruption on the part of Senators has been (not surprisingly) extremely ineffective in the past, that you don't see the whole field.

    Who cares if it is called a co-op or a public option if the details of it give people more access to health care and doctors more power to make medical decisions?

    I guess that's just not as much fun.

    And by the way, on the Medicare for All thing, how are you going to address the Part D morass? Do you really want cancer patients to be forced to shell out $10K a year for chemo? Because that is what Medicare for All would do...

    It sounds great, but it has real and big problems. Also, if we do this right, we can free up 8% of GDP, which would balance the budget (and then some) in no time.

    •  Yah, dream on. (0+ / 0-)

      You can totally wonk out on this and imagine if you move this comma over there and put this number here somehow magically the world will be a better place.

      But in the real world people are being given large sums of money to make sure that no real reform takes place (did you read the article on prominent congress folks who are heavily invested in the current system?).

      Perhaps you don't mind that rich and powerful people are subverting our democracy, and by extension, our need for a real, effective, health care system.  Can you imagine what this process would be like if corporations were NOT exerting undue influence on our jelly like congress people?  Single payer would be a central part of this dialogue, not rejected out of hand.

      Also I'm not desperately doing anything.  I'm just frustrated with trying to work with a system that prioritizes the wealthy and powerful over everyone else.  We can't afford that anymore.

      There comes a time when you have to recognize that the system is broken and before anything can be accomplished it must be fixed.

      The ekpyrotic theory hypothesizes that the origin of the observable universe occurred when two parallel branes collided.

      by rubine on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 12:10:52 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  You can be defeatist all you want (0+ / 0-)

        And you can dream of some bizarro revolution which you, and the fringe left, dreams of. Or you can work within the system, and realize that yes there are people who take money that are our opponents, to make the system better and save lives because of it.

        I prefer the latter. I like to be effective.

        •  I'm not thinking of a "bizarro revolution"... (0+ / 0-)

          I think we need to address electoral and lobby reform before we take on big progressive issues.  I want us to win.

          Do you think that is bizarre?

          The ekpyrotic theory hypothesizes that the origin of the observable universe occurred when two parallel branes collided.

          by rubine on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 12:17:38 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  I'm sorry, but who is the defeatist here? ... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ...You're saying the Senate is hopeless, putting forth a plan with several provisions that nobody is going to back - all some clever opponent will have to say is "German plan" - and implying that anybody who disagrees with you is naive, stupid and full of tripe?

      Some people would be better off not reading diaries they comment on, since they already have all the answers.

      by Meteor Blades on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 12:35:56 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Really? (0+ / 0-)

        "German plan," that is going to scare people off? Maybe "French plan," would scare people off, but since it is regarded as the best in the world, i don't see how that could happen if people who supported did their job. My point is that it's the responsibility of the left to argue for why real health care reform is needed--it frees up GDP, which is really the only way to solve the budget crisis--instead of obsessing over the terms used to describe it, and rejecting proposals that could work out-of-hand because they don't like the term.

        To clarify, what I am saying is defeatist is the contention of the other commentator (that nothing will change until we ban lobbying and eliminate first past the post voting, so we shouldn't try anything). Sorry for not making that clear. You made fair points, fair points I have some disagreements with, sorry for not making that clear.

      •  And, to be clear, what I am saying is tripe (0+ / 0-)

        is the left's obsession with terminology instead of substance.

        And I believe the words naive and stupid are words I didn't use. Tripe I did use though.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (137)
  • Community (68)
  • Elections (33)
  • Media (33)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
  • Environment (29)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Civil Rights (26)
  • Culture (25)
  • Barack Obama (24)
  • Hillary Clinton (23)
  • Science (22)
  • Climate Change (22)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Labor (20)
  • Economy (19)
  • Marriage Equality (19)
  • Josh Duggar (18)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site