Skip to main content

View Diary: Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta nailed by Scientific American (67 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Which ones? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    indubitably

    I thought you were asking about the ones that activists put barriers to the research--

    WEAK sauce. Their blocking industrial research it

    seems not INDEPENDENT research into the safety and efficacy of current GMO crops.

    But since you can't seem to follow the thread I'll list them again:

    BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/...

    the USDA report is provided here: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/...  I know you don't seem to like this blog, but a lot of people don't like to link to PDFs directly.  You'll have to actually click on that link over there to get the USDA report.

    And since you didn't like the first one, here's the second one again from Michigan State: http://www.statenews.com/...

    But if you still don't like that here's Reuters:  http://www.reuters.com/...

    What exactly are you disputing?  You don't have a very linear thought process.  Are you disputing that the meeting happened, or that activists interfere with research?  

    Feel free to provide counter evidence to either of those, with actual hyperlinks.

    Darwinic pilgrims claim the image fills them with an overwhelming feeling of logic. --The Onion

    by mem from somerville on Sat Aug 15, 2009 at 07:43:12 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Where are the research studies about the potentia (0+ / 0-)

      health and environmental dangers of GMO products?

      Teabaggers = Tonsil Sticks - tasteless, pale, brittle, only good for depressing and making you gag

      by JerichoJ8 on Sun Aug 16, 2009 at 06:50:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site