Skip to main content

View Diary: Part Deux: Why Sibel Edmonds Will Never Talk (98 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  he wrote - (4.00)
    a thoroughly documented book on it.
    I'm not sure what you think would constitute "trying to prove it" - as far as I can tell he's devoted his entire life to trying to "prove it".
    Don't get me wrong - I think it's wonderful that you've written this diary. I'm just saying that you are on the same path as several others, and I don't understand why all of this line of investigation is regarded as "tin foil" territory around here.

    In my view so much of 9/11 is either not, or poorly explained - the commision was a joke and for that matter - they didn't even want an investigation .  I mean, really , the biggest terrorist event in our nation's history and the Bush administration didn't want to investigate!  

    I'll will grant you - there's definitely some tinfoil out there.  But there's some very legit complaints to be looked into, and discussed.

    Thanks again Boo, keep up the good work...

    •  Has Ruppert (none)
      ever named names?

      He just points out that the certain CIA-affiliated people have been involved in drug smuggling, and he was tried to keep the inconsistencies of the official line from disappearing.

      But he is not selective, and he is prone to promoting any theory that comes along.

      And he won't give you a name of someone he thinks had the talent, motivation, and diabolicalness, to have actually participated.

      Believe me, THE WHOLE GOVERNMENT was not involved.  But reading Ruppert, you would get that impression.

      "What can I say? I just tip my hat and call the Yankees my daddy." -Pedro Martinez

      by BooMan23 on Sun Dec 05, 2004 at 08:57:05 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  read his book. (none)
        He names Cheney as being behind the entire thing.  "Crossing the Rubicon" has been out about a month.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site