Skip to main content

View Diary: Follow up: Birther queen steps in it. (209 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  It's their fantasy, at least: Via crooks & liars: (8+ / 0-)

    One of the problems with trying to track the flood of wingnuttery emitted daily by Rush Limbaugh is that there's so much of it, and it's so ceaseless, that one becomes overwhelmed trying to keep up with it. But there's been a thread in his commentary this past week that's particularly dangerous, and it needs calling out.

    It began on Monday, after the military coup in Honduras. Limbaugh went on the air and said this:

    Limbaugh: So we've got hell breaking loose in Honduras. You know what we learned about Honduras? We learned the Obama administration tried to stop the coup. Now what was -- the coup was what many of you wish would happen here, without the military.

    The next day, describing Obama talking to troops about the withdrawal from Iraq, he described the president thus:

    "This is a guy who sought their defeat."

    And then yesterday, he expanded on these thoughts even further:

    This is Barack Obama, who led from the United States Senate his party into doing everything he could to ensure the defeat of the U.S. military. ... This party was doing everything it could to impugn and dishonor the military.

    This thread of commentary clearly is pushing toward a single thought -- to push people in the armed forces into seeing Obama as a usurper and traitor, just like the Honduran president, and toward the idea that a similar military-based removal of him from office might be justified.

    Keep in mind that Limbaugh is only of only four pundits still broadcast daily on Armed Services Radio, so our men and women in uniform are getting fed this garbage on a daily basis. (And Wes Clark was right: It is well past time to take him off.)

    Could it happen?  Probably not, but it encourages teabaggers and assassins and secessionists to think that the military will rise up and take their back

    This "Baucus" plan costs $850 Billion over ten years and delivers very little reform or health care. Why not spend 17% more for a public option?

    by Inland on Fri Sep 18, 2009 at 07:31:41 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site