Skip to main content

View Diary: Leahy and Grassley:  FBI Verified Allegations of Sibel Edmonds (44 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Hastert Turkey connection? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Is Daschele a schill of the healthcare industry? Did Rove have his fingers in the demise of Siegleman? Did Edwards impregnate a woman that might have become the Whitehouse's 2nd First lady?

    Is Dennis Hastert being paid $35000 per month by Turkey to lobby on their behalf?

    Is Edmonds correct about this? Any flags?
    Nope, nothing here, (chuckle) nothing here, not here (GW looking under his desk), no WMDs where George was WMDs anywhere. Why is Edmonds so persistent in her quest to have her story heard?

    Because she's not lying".

    Check out the above. You don't have to have an opinion of facts...unless you are Beckless. After that feel free to go where no man has ever gone before Beck.  

    •  LOL (0+ / 0-)

      Except that she was lying about Shackowsky.  

      •  You Haven't Proven That Mia (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        lysias, chigh, kafkananda, Johnny Q

        I want you to acknowledge the fact that one item apparently being wrong does not undermine the whole story, especially since the FBI itself (and the DOJ Inspector General) told the Senate Judiciary Committee that much of what Edmonds said was true.  

        Plus, why would the Bush Administration impose State Secrets on Sibel Edmonds twice if she were a mere 'fantasist'?

        •  Well (0+ / 0-)

          The verifiable details of the story are all wrong, and the fact that won't just admit that and wants to engage in a gay witch hunt pretty much destroys any credibiility she had left.  She isn't just a witness - she is an advocate for her conspiracy, and that is why she isn't credible.  

          I expect that the Bush administration shut her down because she worked in a sensitive postion and she had a big mouth.  

          Hey lenlarga, maybe you would like to undergo a lie detector test to see what your sexual orientation is and whether you have cheated on your spouse?  
          What's that?  no thanks.  According to Sibel Edmonds, that makes you a liar.

          What a piece of shit Edmonds is.

        •  It Doesn't Help her Case Either. (0+ / 0-)

          Especially when the story seems so far-fetched to begin with.

          Note to Tea-baggers: Crazy isn't a valid counter-argument!

          by kefauver on Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 11:27:34 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site