Skip to main content

View Diary: Mark Foley, Victim (25 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Semantics from you. Proves nothing. No truth. (0+ / 0-)

    No honesty.

    And Foley and the Republicans pulled out all the stops to make sure he wasn't prosecuted nor charged.

    Depends on the prosecutors and their political winds as to who gets hammered. Foley walked. But it wasn't because he was innocent nor because he did not cross a line.

    Clinton walked into the trap that was set by the hypocrite GOP monstrosity.  

    The only thing this proves is that the GOP is much better at the Inquisition than Democrats.

    <div style="color: #a00000;"> Our... constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the power to control men's minds. Thurgood Marshal

    by bronte17 on Sun Oct 04, 2009 at 03:04:33 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Semantics? (0+ / 0-)

      Bill Clinton had sex with a consenting adult.

      That was not a crime.

      Bill Clinton lied under oath in a court of law.

      That was a crime.

      OK, where does semantics figure in to that?


      You are playing with the truth to convict someone who was neither charged nor convicted.

      You are assuming that Foley broke some law but are providing nothing but your feeling to support your charges.

      That dog just don't hunt in court.

      15 to 6. Pulled ahead as soon as the gate opened and never looked back....

      by BobTrips on Sun Oct 04, 2009 at 03:25:37 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site