Skip to main content

View Diary: 'Nay' on Proposed Stalking Rule (312 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Two points (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    1. Define multiple. Two? Five? Seven? Furthermore, we're a closed system here. If someone's a health care nut, they'll be following the health care diaries. That means that people can argue in multiple threads without it being stalking; they just happen to share a similar passion and keep frequenting the same place due to their shared interest. Common debating partners or stalkers? That's a very iffy judgment call.
    1. "follows a community member into diary threads, posts comments that consists of false information, personal attacks, lies, rumors , or implied/express disclosure of private information with the intent to harass, harm, humiliate, frighten or intimidate another poster"

    All of the italicized could be POV things. John Edwards adultery questions with regards to electability, for instance, would have been accurate but would've violated multiple portions, especially on dKos where he was favored.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site