Skip to main content

View Diary: SCOTUS To Hear Case On Right To Know Anti-Gay Signers (198 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  When the standard's strict scrutiny (0+ / 0-)

    and there's a "compelling State interest," the means of accomplishing that interest must be the 'least restrictive' that will accomplish the interest.



    I am not currently Licensed to Practice in this State.

    by ben masel on Sun Jan 17, 2010 at 12:37:09 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Do you think (0+ / 0-)

      I could run for office while forbidding the government from publishing my name?  That's how ridiculous this sounds to me.

      The question is not whether the chickens needed replacing, the question is whether the fox should have been guarding them in the first place.

      by happymisanthropy on Sun Jan 17, 2010 at 12:58:29 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site