Skip to main content

View Diary: MA-Sen: Ten Days of Scott Brown (237 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  "Plan for Coakley losing" pretty much... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    cameoanne, randomfacts

    ...sums up the dipshit mentality of the Obama apologists here.

    MY GOD!

    How about we plan on making sure she FUCKING WINS! Is that too much to ask?

    Had the incompetent dumbasses in the White House taken this race seriously and PLANNED, they could have stepped in earlier and maybe staved off this (let's hope not) defeat.

    I am just stunned by the rationalization and excuses people are making for the White House.

    Yes, she was a poor candidate. But, for the love of God, she still could have won.

    •  White House needed to propose real reform. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Was where the White House failed on everything from health care to Wall Street regulation Obama turned off Obama voters by failing to deliver on change, transparency and government for people vs. for Wall Street.

      You'll note that the polling shows 20% of Obama voters voting for Brown. It's  protest vote on not getting change and transparency.

      Coakley is just a weak candidate that Democratic Party put up and Democratic voters elected. You can't blame White House for that. Had Coakley come out with her hair on fire saying she'd vote AGAINST health care bill unless it had real reform in it, she'd be winning. Instead she said she'd vote for the junk health care bill and now she's losing.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site