Skip to main content

View Diary: The Big WTO Problems With The Senate Bill- A Globalization Gotcha Like No Other (35 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  They probably predated these agreements (0+ / 0-)

    Also, European "private" systems are nonprofit, really nonprofit. They are nothing like the private for profit corporations here.

    For example, every Dutch citizen has around $160 a month taken out of their taxes (so people cannot be dumped because they missed a bill by a day) and they get full health coverage for everybody, with no extra costs.

    Selling Insurance across State Lines triggers NAFTA-like provisions in the GATS treaty that potentially makes affordable healthcare impossible!

    by Andiamo on Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 06:32:33 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  No (0+ / 0-)

      Netherlands started their news system in 2006

      In the choice between changing ones mind and proving there's no need to do so, most people get busy on the proof.

      by jsfox on Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 06:36:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The EU has a LOT of information on PubMed Central (0+ / 0-)

        Selling Insurance across State Lines triggers NAFTA-like provisions in the GATS treaty that potentially makes affordable healthcare impossible!

        by Andiamo on Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 07:35:49 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I think both the EU and US have applied for (0+ / 0-)

          and gotten some exemptions in some specific areas. That is mentioned in the report.

          Perhaps we could do that too. But, we need to explicitly state the fact that this exemption permits single payer (no access for private insurers in that geographic area, public insurance, funded by taxes, no commercial sales, single payer, single buyer) and public- national or state run "optional" insurance plans as well. (The kind that Ontario was not allowed to implement with auto insurance by NAFTA in 1993 because they represented a barrier to trade)

          Really, we need an exemption for health services because otherwise, foreign insurance firms may well start selling the low value plans they sell in the Third World here. And they are like the terrible high deductible plans many third tier insurance firms sell here now, the kinds that cause so many problems.

          Bluntly, its CRUCIAL that all of this be done BEFORE arrogant, corrupt politicians who "represent Americans" give the false stamp of approval to a really badly crafted ugly bill that could be used in the future to FALSELY say that Americans "did not want single payer healthcare", when they CLEARLY DO overwhelmingly DO want a national all-inclusive plan, paid for by taxes, that covers everybody affordably...

          Americans will not stand by and let legislators do an end run around democracy- They want real, nt fake change. The change they want is not more of the same, or WORSE of the same.

          Americans know the difference between crapsurance and decent quality healthcare. They aren't stupid. They know Canada manages this issue, it isn't rocket science.

          Americans are already very pissed off that legislators keep trying to say they support crap-underinsurance, when they don't They want QUALITY HEALTHCARE - whatever it takes. If it takes major regulation of providers and throwing the insurers out once and for all, they want and need that.

          They do not want more of the same.

          For evidence of that, just look at Massachusetts's mess.

          The people of this country come first.

          If the legislators want to comply with the WTO requests that gave the multinationals permanent, irrevocable access to our market, permanently kicking single payer into the "impossible to ever do" category- even as hundreds of thousands of Americans are dying a year because they can't afford healthcare, they will find that Americans don't want to reelect them and want to dump these trade agreements as well.

          THAT would be the last straw.

          Get my point?

          The fact that both the McCain and Obama campaigns contained proposals that would have initiated the WTO treaty provisions for healthcare scares me.

          I would be surprised if it was not intentional. Politicians pretend to endorse affordability but their real allegiance is to their big corporate donors. They have also proven to be very dishonest on everything involved with this particular issue.

          They would like nothing more than to do an end run around democracy and prevent affordable healthcare by fiat.

          Selling Insurance across State Lines triggers NAFTA-like provisions in the GATS treaty that potentially makes affordable healthcare impossible!

          by Andiamo on Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 08:51:38 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  Wasn't the Dutch system changed then based on (0+ / 0-)

        international law concerns?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site