Skip to main content

View Diary: UPDATED: Details of Virginia's Lawsuit to Stop HCR (87 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I don't see how they could have (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SallyCat, Catte Nappe

    standing. An individual who is effected by the mandate might but even then I think it would withstand a court challenge. Even so they'd have to wait until 2014 to file that lawsuit.

    And the Ten Amendment questions have been settled. Long time ago.

    "You Don't Do More With Less. You Do Less with Less. That's Why it's called Less." David Simon

    by Larry Madill on Tue Mar 23, 2010 at 10:19:24 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  The only ones that might have early standing (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GrouchoKossak

      would be insurance companies being required to expand coverage to pre-existing conditions. But that's against their own interests cause it would then potentially take away the exchanges and 32 million new insured.

      He specifically addressed 10th Amendment as not being applicable, but IANAL so it didn't make a lot of sense to me.

      The only thing you get from sitting on the fence is splinters in your ass. My Granddaddy!

      by SallyCat on Tue Mar 23, 2010 at 10:22:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site