Skip to main content

View Diary: Frank panel recommends almost $1T in defense cuts (140 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  And for further evidence (0+ / 0-)

    The fact is that the US decided to throw unprotected cannon fodder at the Normandy landing, while the British used complex technology to try to protect the troops during the landing.  So the US really did not deploy its technology to "reduce casualty rates" during WWII.

    You just don't know what the hell you're talking about.

    -5.63, -8.10. Learn about Duverger's Law.

    by neroden on Tue Jun 15, 2010 at 10:09:49 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Re: And further evidence (0+ / 0-)

      So, you're supporting the British approach of using expensive high tech solutions to reduce casualty rates?

      Wouldn't that be a point in support of my position that the proposed military cuts are shortsighted?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site