Skip to main content

View Diary: HCR:  Where Do We Go Now, Sweet Child 'O Mine? (45 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  On HSAs: (0+ / 0-)

    I pose the same public policy question to you:  Do you think a $5,000 deductible policy is a public policy for a family earning $50,000/yr. with a diabetic child?

    The problem with high deductible plans, as I also pointed out earlier, is that people cut out both the good and the bad.  On the positive side, the HSA would force the person to choose the cheaper doctor.  On the negative side, the high deductible encourages people to forgo good treatments as well, i.e., counseling, that prevent large medical expenses, i.e., hospitalization.

    •  High deductible is only half the equation (0+ / 0-)

      The other half is enforced savings. The premium is automatically put into the HSA account for the patient.

      So now you are correct that somebody who has a chronic need will more likely max out the out-of-pocket limit in a HSA plan than in a HMO plan. But on the positive side, the premium cost will be lower for everyone due to the collective effort at saving money. You could also change the deductible slightly such that the individual limit is lower, but the family limit is higher. Usually in one family only one person has chronic needs.

      The bottom line is that the insured patient has to be incentivized to watch the expenses. The HMO plan, with the fixed co-pay does the worst job at this.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (148)
  • Community (68)
  • Elections (34)
  • Media (33)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
  • Environment (30)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Culture (29)
  • Law (29)
  • Civil Rights (28)
  • Barack Obama (25)
  • Science (25)
  • Hillary Clinton (24)
  • Climate Change (23)
  • Republicans (23)
  • Labor (23)
  • Economy (20)
  • Marriage Equality (19)
  • Josh Duggar (19)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site