Skip to main content

View Diary: Why there's no such thing as "Reverse Racism" (169 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Ditto with sexism (0+ / 0-)

    the element of institution power has to be addressed.  Women can't be sexist towards men.

    ---
    Toyota: Proof US Union Labor Still Does it Better

    by VelvetElvis on Thu Jul 15, 2010 at 03:55:22 PM PDT

    •  yeah. (1+ / 1-)
      Recommended by:
      Rick Aucoin
      Hidden by:
      VelvetElvis

      that's why 70% of women gain custody of children in court or most alimony payments are towards women. I think there is plenty of structure in place for women.

      Entry Level .NET programmer looking for work

      by SetaSan on Thu Jul 15, 2010 at 04:48:14 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Uprated for HR abuse. `nt` (0+ / 0-)

        :: Not so hopeful now ::

        by Rick Aucoin on Fri Jul 16, 2010 at 04:15:48 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  It makes sense (0+ / 0-)

        that you would promote both the idea of "Reverse Racism" and "Reverse Sexism".

        What you don't deal with is the sexism of a system that automatically remands children to the custody of their mother, while at the same time it reduces their income level, fails to provide child care, and makes them dependent on financial resources which are often withheld. There's a reason that the majority of people in poverty in the U.S. are single women with children. But that doesn't seem to concern you.

        Do 50% of men actually want custody of their children? Can you demonstrate that?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site