Skip to main content

View Diary: Rangel defends Rangel (176 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof (0+ / 0-)

    I found the proof lacking given the fact that the "evidence" provided was easily proven incorrect.  I did correct the part about Goss not being in Congress, however I also demonstrated how this could not be a GOP "setup".

    If larkspurlane walks it back I'll gladly remove the HR.

    •  Those aren't extraordinary claims... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      CupofTea, Mets102

      ...they're simple falsehoods.

      It's not a dramatic conspiracy theory to say that Porter Goss is in charge of the House Ethics Committee.

      It's just factually incorrect.

      So say it and move on.

      "In public, the parties stage a show of bitter bipartisan stalemate. But when the cameras are off, they fuck like crazed weasels in heat." - Matt Taibbi

      by GreenSooner on Tue Aug 10, 2010 at 03:45:22 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site