Skip to main content

View Diary: How to Destroy Lieberman (47 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  We can do more than one thing at a time. (none)
    .

    Stop the war! Draft Bush voters!

    by NoAlternative on Thu Feb 03, 2005 at 04:11:29 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  You miss the point (none)
      I am sure you and the other left-wing fanatics will be more obsessed with Lieberman's primary than other races with vulnerable Republicans. And in the process you'll probably even whine about who our candidates are in those other races too.
      •  Whine? (2.75)
        You make me very angry you ignorant piece of shit. Did you come here even once during the election? Was there any place with a larger contingent of loyal Democrats, right down the line in every race, in every state? We may not succeed in our every pet issue and activism-du-jour, but we don't sit around lobbing cynical spitballs like you. How dare you accuse us of whining about Democratic candidates?

        "We must uphold a familiar commerce together in all meekness, gentleness, patience and liberality."

        by Marshall on Thu Feb 03, 2005 at 04:18:28 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Don't insult me (none)
          But it was true. People here were whining about Brad Carson, Chris John, and Dan Mongiardo. And now, because of that, we now have Senators Coburn, Vitter, and Bunning.
          •  Because of that? (4.00)
            Oh really? I certainly didn't witness any of that whining, and if that somehow outweighs the massive fundraising this site undertook, you're seriously delusional.

            And anyway, in political terms ridding ourselves of Joe is worth more than a single additional vote against Gonzalez and the like. Joe actively harms us at every step.

            "We must uphold a familiar commerce together in all meekness, gentleness, patience and liberality."

            by Marshall on Thu Feb 03, 2005 at 04:28:58 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Well then (none)
              I hope that you and the others here are right. I would just hate to see election night come to see someone like Santorum win by 20,000 votes while Lieberman's challenger takes that seat because many people here had to send a "message".
              •  Furthemore (none)
                No Republican is going to win in Connecticut. The last they elected was Lowell Weicker who
                1. lost to Lieberman
                2. endorsed Dean

                "We must uphold a familiar commerce together in all meekness, gentleness, patience and liberality."

                by Marshall on Thu Feb 03, 2005 at 04:32:51 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

        •  chill out (none)
          No need to swear. Both of you have valid arguments. Money and time aren't infinite resources, the debate is whether the party is better off w/o Lieberman, or better off ignoring him and focusing on weak Reps. I don't know what the answer. But just judging from all the Lieberman diaries today, I could easily see us here getting a little obsessed with the CT priamary come next year. I don't know if that's bad or good. No need to call someone an ignorant shit for bringing it up.
      •  This is why you get troll rated (none)
        you blink you eyelashes like people are picking on you then insult people with no basis in reality.  

        Stop the war! Draft Bush voters!

        by NoAlternative on Thu Feb 03, 2005 at 04:42:17 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site