Skip to main content

View Diary: HEMMED In - Too Big To Fail? Too Small to Care About. (57 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The problem was actually getting the (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    doc2, JanF, trashablanca, addisnana

    mortgages to the slice-and-dice machine.  The slicing and dicing itself has no impact on the mortgages, since that's just selling and repackaging beneficial interests.  If systemic problems arise, it'll be in the process of getting the mortgage from the originator to the trust (which is the thing sliced and diced)

    •  The actual problem is Utter and Shameful Greed (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      trashablanca

      in my opinion.

      The banksters could not be bothered trying to sort out the mess so they hired people to create fraudulent affidavits to help their bottom line and protect their personal bonuses.

      That we bailed these guys out only to be poked in the eye is a sin.

      Much of life is knowing what to Google
      (and blogging at BPI Campus)

      by JanF on Fri Oct 15, 2010 at 06:03:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The fraudulent affadavits issue is (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        addisnana

        a very obscure one. It occurs in a servicer's back office, or in a third party law firm. Due to the volume of foreclosures, some short-sighted managers decided to make the signatory process a factory-like one. Whoops. So many foreclosures will have to be refiled, delaying the process. Maybe some borrowers will get a modification they weren't otherwise going to get. But for the vast, vast majority of borrowers, this will just be a delay; the servicers hold their notes, and the borrowers are not able or not willing to pay. This is a big deal, but needs to be put in its proper perspective.

        I'm in the I-fucking-love-this-guy wing of the Democratic Party!

        by doc2 on Fri Oct 15, 2010 at 06:07:54 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  It is a big deal if you are out of your home (0+ / 0-)

          I am not sure I get this:

          But for the vast, vast majority of borrowers, this will just be a delay; the servicers hold their notes, and the borrowers are not able or not willing to pay. This is a big deal, but needs to be put in its proper perspective.

          They are locking people out of their houses.

          Much of life is knowing what to Google
          (and blogging at BPI Campus)

          by JanF on Fri Oct 15, 2010 at 06:09:41 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I'm trying to separate the anecdotal (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            addisnana

            from the real trends. Anecdotally, with all the millions of defaults, there are some individual horror stories that are making the rounds that make it seem like servicers are foreclosing on borrowers that are current of even on people who do not have mortgages. But this is not what is happening for the most part. If people are locked out of their houses, it is because they borrowed money and agreed to provide the houses as collateral. It was a contract, and judges just need to ensure that a) the servicer has proper documentation, and b) the borrower was provided with the option of modifying (but cannot or will not do so).

            I'm in the I-fucking-love-this-guy wing of the Democratic Party!

            by doc2 on Fri Oct 15, 2010 at 06:24:03 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

        •  There is an opportunity (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          JanF, winterbanyan

          For the loan modifications that TSTCA people "deserve" and a way to prevent so many foreclosures that any recovery in the real estate market is pushed out years and years. It is a way to protect both the value of property, which declines rapidly when unoccupied and a way to keep people in homes they could afford with loan modifications.

          The paper work issue is giving us an opportunity to do the right thing.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site